Mineral Wool vs. Fiberglass vs. Cellulose - Insulation

When it comes to insulation, there are a few options available to help you keep your home or business more comfortable and energy-efficient during extreme weather. Among these are batts or blankets, which are placed between studs or posts in a structure, then covered over with some type of hard wall surface, such as drywall or paneling. The materials available for these batts include mineral wool and fiberglass as the most common varieties.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website.

A third option that is very popular is blown-in cellulose insulation. This type of insulation requires a blower that uses air pressure to push the material through a hose into an opening in the wall to place the insulation properly. But which of these there options is best for your situation? Here's a quick look at the benefits and drawbacks of all three types of insulation.

Mineral Wool Insulation

In many ways, mineral wool is a superior insulation product. It has a higher R-value per inch compared to fiberglass, about a 22-37% higher R-value. It contains 70% recycled material, making it a greener product than fiberglass at 20-30% recycled material.. With a density over three times that of fiberglass, mineral wool has superior sound-deadening properties. The stiffer batts don't tend to flop over as easily as fiberglass, making it easier to put in place, and they don't require staples or wire to keep them in place. It's hydrophobic, so it won't absorb water or encourage the growth of mold and mildew. Mineral wool is also very fire resistant and can act as a fire stop.

Decai contains other products and information you need, so please check it out.

However, like many building materials, mineral wool also has its drawbacks. It tends to be more expensive than fiberglass, often between 25-50% higher in cost . Because it is more unusual, it's not available in as wide a range of sizes as fiberglass and is almost never available in a paper-faced format. Because it's denser, it's also heavier, which can make it more ungainly to handle during ceiling installations. Its dense nature requires the use of a serrated bread knife or wood saw to cut batts down to size, and it's very difficult to find in a loose-fill format.

Here's a quick overview of the R-value you can expect from different depths of mineral wool batting:

• For 2×4' R13 to R15
• For 2×6' R21 to R23
• For 2×8' R30 to R32
• For 2×10' R38

Synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs) have been widely used as insulation material in places where asbestos was used many years ago and therefore the hazards have been compared. Since the three principal types of asbestos fibers types have caused lung cancer at high exposures, there is a widely held belief that all fibers are carcinogenic if inhaled in large enough doses. Hence, on a morphological basis, SVFs have been studied for their carcinogenic potential. However, there is considerable evidence that differences exist among fibers in their potency to produce a carcinogenic response. In this attempt to carry out a numerical risk assessment for the installers of blown glass wool (fiber) insulation, we start with a characterization of the material; then we review the exposures both in manufacturing and installation. Neither the epidemiological studies of human exposure nor the animal studies have shown a marked hazardous effect from glass wool and we can therefore be sure that any effect that might exist is small. But in this case, as in many other situations where there is a potential hazard, society desires further reassurance and therefore we have made a mechanistic calculation. There are good estimates of the risk associated with exposure to chrysotile asbestos at high exposures and doses. We have therefore taken these numbers and discussed how much less risky an exposure to glass wool fibers might be. We conclude that for a given fiber count, glass wool is five to ten times less risky (and of course the risk might be zero). The risk for a nonsmoking installer of glass wool fiber insulation who wears a respirator is about 6 in a million (and might be zero) per year. This means that out of a million installers there might be six lung cancers from this cause every year or out of 10,000 installers there might be one in 16 years. The low risk of 6 in a million per year of a worker blowing glass wool is consistent with the fact that no one has found any of cancer attributable to the manufacture or installation of glass wool fibers in spite of diligent searches. This is compared with several other occupational risks. Nonetheless common prudence suggests that any installer of blown glass wool fiber insulation wear a respirator.

Contact us to discuss your requirements of Glass Wool Acoustic Panels. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.